What does Carnegie seem to have believed would be the best way to improve the lives of other people, and how can you tell?  

What is your opinion of this approach?  What is a counter argument?  

If you had hundreds of millions of dollars to give away, what would you do?

He seemed to have believed that the best way to improve the lives of others would be to donate money to organizations promoting education and science instead of giving money to people hoping they would do something important and helpful with it. He also believed that the best way to improve the lives of others was to donate money to people who died or was injured trying to save the lives of others.

I like his idea because it does more than just helping a few people but instead he helps the united states because he donates it to large organizations. A counter argument would be that not only to send money to people who act heroically but instead to people who are benefitting the economy. But i don't agree because people who lose things acting heroically deserve something.

If I had hundreds of millions of dollars to giveaway, I would form and organization that helps kids pay for their college tuition. But the organization wouldn't pay for kids who don't try. The kids would have to give an effort and try in school, And try to be successful in life, or it would all go to waste.